Baker v. Link

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baker v. Link

248 A.D. 699

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Plaintiff appeals from so much of an order as denies his motion to strike out the first separate defense and to dismiss the counterclaim in the amended answer. Defendant appeals from so much of said order as grants plaintiff’s motion to the extent of striking out the second, third and fourth defenses contained in the amended answer. Order unanimously modified by reinstating the second defense, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff appeals from so much of an order as denies his motion to strike out the first separate defense and to dismiss the counterclaim in the amended answer. Defendant appeals from so much of said order as grants plaintiff’s motion to the extent of striking out the second, third and fourth defenses contained in the amended answer. Order unanimously modified by reinstating the second defense, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Baker v. Link, 248 A.D. 699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 699 (Baker v. Link) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.