Baker v. Lark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baker v. Lark

30 A.D.2d 683, 292 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3776

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 683 (Baker v. Lark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Lark, 30 A.D.2d 683, 292 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

In this proceeding to invalidate (1) petition designating Sumner C. Lark as a candidate for the Democratic party’s nomination for the public office of Member of the Assembly from the 56th Assembly District, Kings County, in the Primary Election to be held on June 18, 1968 and (2) the substitution of Wade N. Lassiter as such designee, said designee and substituted designee and Bertram D. White, Blaine Thompson and George K. Walters (Committee to Fill Vacancies) appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 10, 1968, which inter alia granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Leave is granted to appellants to appeal further to the Court of Appeals. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this proceeding to invalidate (1) petition designating Sumner C. Lark as a candidate for the Democratic party’s nomination for the public office of Member of the Assembly from the 56th Assembly District, Kings County, in the Primary Election to be held on June 18, 1968 and (2) the substitution of Wade N. Lassiter as such designee, said designee and substituted designee and Bertram D. White, Blaine Thompson and George K. Walters (Committee to Fill Vacancies) appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 10, 1968, which inter alia granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Leave is granted to appellants to appeal further to the Court of Appeals. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 683, 292 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-lark-nyappdiv-1968.