Baker v. Johnson
This text of 43 P.3d 1217 (Baker v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He challenges an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision deferring his projected parole release date. We conclude that the trial court correctly rejected plaintiffs arguments on the merits of that issue. Hamel v. Johnson, 173 Or App 448, 25 P3d 314 (2001).
Plaintiff also asserts that the trial court erred in imposing $475 in costs for his court-appointed counsel. We reverse the award of costs for court-appointed counsel and remand for reconsideration in light of Bacote v. Johnson, 333 Or 28, 35 P3d 1019 (2001).
Award of costs for court-appointed counsel reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 P.3d 1217, 180 Or. App. 603, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-johnson-orctapp-2002.