Baker v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Baker v. Johnson

43 P.3d 1217, 180 Or. App. 603, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 538

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 10, 2002·No. 98-05-29736M; A104219·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He challenges an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision deferring his projected parole release date. We conclude that the trial court correctly rejected plaintiffs arguments on the merits of that issue. Hamel v. Johnson, 173 Or App 448, 25 P3d 314 (2001).

Plaintiff also asserts that the trial court erred in imposing $475 in costs for his court-appointed counsel. We reverse the award of costs for court-appointed counsel and remand for reconsideration in light of Bacote v. Johnson, 333 Or 28, 35 P3d 1019 (2001).

Award of costs for court-appointed counsel reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He challenges an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision deferring his projected parole release date. We conclude that the trial court correctly rejected plaintiffs arguments on the merits of that issue. Hamel v. Johnson, 173 Or App 448, 25 P3d 314 (2001).

Plaintiff also asserts that the trial court erred in imposing $475 in costs for his court-appointed counsel. We reverse the award of costs for court-appointed counsel and remand for reconsideration in light of Bacote v. Johnson, 333 Or 28, 35 P3d 1019 (2001).

Award of costs for court-appointed counsel reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.

Baker v. Johnson, 43 P.3d 1217, 180 Or. App. 603, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 538 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

43 P.3d 1217 (Baker v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related