Baker v. John Harvards Brew House, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baker v. John Harvards Brew House, LLC

43 A.D.3d 840, 840 N.Y.S.2d 922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 11, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 43 A.D.3d 840 (Baker v. John Harvards Brew House, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. John Harvards Brew House, LLC, 43 A.D.3d 840, 840 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries pursuant to General Obligations Law § 11-101, the defendant Patricia Ann Cottage Pub, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J.), dated August 9, 2006, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that triable issues of fact exist as to whether the plaintiff caused or procured the intoxication of the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident which resulted in his alleged injuries (see Mitchell v The Shoals, Inc., 19 NY2d 338, 341 [1967]), and was thereby precluded from recovering damages under the Dram Shop Act (see General Obligations Law § 11-101). Accordingly, the court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it (see Baker v D.J. Stapleton, Inc., 43 AD3d 839 [2007] [decided herewith]). Prudenti, PJ., Mastro, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries pursuant to General Obligations Law § 11-101, the defendant Patricia Ann Cottage Pub, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J.), dated August 9, 2006, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that triable issues of fact exist as to whether the plaintiff caused or procured the intoxication of the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident which resulted in his alleged injuries (see Mitchell v The Shoals, Inc., 19 NY2d 338, 341 [1967]), and was thereby precluded from recovering damages under the Dram Shop Act (see General Obligations Law § 11-101). Accordingly, the court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it (see Baker v D.J. Stapleton, Inc., 43 AD3d 839 [2007] [decided herewith]). Prudenti, PJ., Mastro, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.3d 840, 840 N.Y.S.2d 922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-john-harvards-brew-house-llc-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack