Baker v. Jewell

229 A.D.2d 924, 646 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8950

This text of 229 A.D.2d 924 (Baker v. Jewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Jewell, 229 A.D.2d 924, 646 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The injuries sustained by plaintiff’s daughter were the result of the unanticipated actions of another student. The intervening acts of that student, not the alleged negligence of the attendance officer, were the proximate cause of the injuries sustained by plaintiff’s daughter (see, DeMunda v Niagara Wheatfield Bd. of Educ., 213 AD2d 975; Rock v Central Sq. [925]*925School Dist., 113 AD2d 1008). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rock v. Central Square School District
113 A.D.2d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
DeMunda v. Niagara Wheatfield Board of Education
213 A.D.2d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 A.D.2d 924, 646 N.Y.S.2d 479, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-jewell-nyappdiv-1996.