Baker v. Huevel
This text of 420 So. 2d 335 (Baker v. Huevel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion for change of venue.1 For the reasons which follow, we reverse and remand with directions to transfer this cause to Orange County, Florida.
The three-count unsworn complaint alleges that the appellant had executed and delivered certain unsecured promissory notes to plaintiff’s assignor in Dade County, Florida. Payment on the notes was due in Dade County, Florida. Appellee concedes that venue in this case is governed by Section 47.061, Florida Statutes (1979),2 but argues that Dr. Baker failed to satisfy his burden of pleading and proving facts which would defeat venue as laid.
The only evidence before the trial court on the venue issue is the sworn affidavit of Dr. Baker reciting that the notes were made and delivered in Orange County, Florida, and that he is an Orange County resident. Consistent with the holding of our sister court in Foster v. Greco, 320 So.2d 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), we likewise conclude that in the absence of any other proofs, Section 47.061 is controlling.
Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand with directions to enter an order transferring the cause to the circuit court of Orange County, Florida.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
420 So. 2d 335, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-huevel-fladistctapp-1982.