Baker v. Henderson Keasler Law Firm

857 So. 2d 367, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16014, 2003 WL 22415358
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 24, 2003
DocketNo. 1D03-2258
StatusPublished

This text of 857 So. 2d 367 (Baker v. Henderson Keasler Law Firm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Henderson Keasler Law Firm, 857 So. 2d 367, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16014, 2003 WL 22415358 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

WOLF, C.J.

Baker files a Petition for Writ of Certio-rari challenging an order requiring him to pay his withdrawing counsel before allowing substitute counsel to appear. This order is reviewable by certiorari. See generally, St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Marina Bay Resort Condo. Ass’n, Inc., 794 So.2d 755 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). The challenged order departs from the essential requirements of law. Kiriakidis v. Kiriakidis, 855 So.2d 208, 2003 WL 22187836 (Fla. 4th DCA Sept.24, 2003) (finding error to require party to pay fees of withdrawing attorney prior to allowing new counsel to appear when amount of fees are in dispute). We, therefore, grant the Petition for Writ of Certiorari; we quash the order of the circuit court and direct the trial court to enter a new order consistent with this opinion.

LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. MARINA BAY RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASSOC., INC.
794 So. 2d 755 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Kiriakidis v. Kiriakidis
855 So. 2d 208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
857 So. 2d 367, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16014, 2003 WL 22415358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-henderson-keasler-law-firm-fladistctapp-2003.