Baker v. Hall

15 Iowa 277, 1863 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 101
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided December 9, 1863·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Lowe, J.

Whether a bona fide, purchaser of personal property from one who held both the title and the possession, under a contract of purchase, upon the express condition that he would perform a specific act, which he failed to do, can hold the same against the first vendor, has been settled by this Court in the case of Bailey v. Harris, 8 Iowa, 331, and reaffirmed again in the case of Robinson v. Chapline, 9 Iowa, 91. These decisions are against the appellant in this case, and upon their authority we must affirm the same.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. Hall, 15 Iowa 277, 1863 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 101 (iowa 1863).

15 Iowa 277 (Baker v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Union Bank & Trust Co. of Stanwood v. Willey
24 N.W.2d 796 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1946)
National Cash Register Co. v. Maloney
64 N.W. 618 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1895)
City National Bank v. Tufts
63 Tex. 113 (Texas Supreme Court, 1885)
Heinbockle v. Zugbaum
5 Mont. 344 (Montana Supreme Court, 1885)
Homans v. Newton
4 F. 880 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1880)
Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive Works
93 U.S. 664 (Supreme Court, 1877)
Lacy v. Dubuque Lumber Co.
43 Iowa 510 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1876)
Moseley & Bro. v. Shattuck
43 Iowa 540 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1876)