Baker v. Grossjean

Supreme Court

Baker v. Grossjean

311 U.S. 618, 61 S. Ct. 169

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 18, 1940·No. No. 356; No. 399·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motions for leave to file supplemental statements as to jurisdiction are granted.. [619]*619The appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Lent v. Tillson, 140 U. S. 316, 328; Paulsen v. Portland, 149 U. S. 30, 40; North Laramie Land Co. v. Hoffman, 268 U. S. 276, 283; Fidelity National Bank v. Swope, 274 U. S. 123, 130.

Mr. Horace C. Young for appellants. Mr. Nat Tipton for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motions for leave to file supplemental statements as to jurisdiction are granted.. [619]*619The appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Lent v. Tillson, 140 U. S. 316, 328; Paulsen v. Portland, 149 U. S. 30, 40; North Laramie Land Co. v. Hoffman, 268 U. S. 276, 283; Fidelity National Bank v. Swope, 274 U. S. 123, 130.

Mr. Horace C. Young for appellants. Mr. Nat Tipton for appellees.

Baker v. Grossjean, 311 U.S. 618, 61 S. Ct. 169 (1940).

Pincite

311 U.S. 618 (Baker v. Grossjean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related