Baker v. Grossjean

Supreme Court

Baker v. Grossjean

311 U.S. 618, 61 S. Ct. 169

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 18, 1940

DocketNo. 356; No. 399

StatusPublished

This text of 311 U.S. 618 (Baker v. Grossjean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Grossjean, 311 U.S. 618, 61 S. Ct. 169 (1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motions for leave to file supplemental statements as to jurisdiction are granted.. [619]*619The appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Lent v. Tillson, 140 U. S. 316, 328; Paulsen v. Portland, 149 U. S. 30, 40; North Laramie Land Co. v. Hoffman, 268 U. S. 276, 283; Fidelity National Bank v. Swope, 274 U. S. 123, 130.

Mr. Horace C. Young for appellants. Mr. Nat Tipton for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motions for leave to file supplemental statements as to jurisdiction are granted.. [619]*619The appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Lent v. Tillson, 140 U. S. 316, 328; Paulsen v. Portland, 149 U. S. 30, 40; North Laramie Land Co. v. Hoffman, 268 U. S. 276, 283; Fidelity National Bank v. Swope, 274 U. S. 123, 130.

Mr. Horace C. Young for appellants. Mr. Nat Tipton for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

311 U.S. 618, 61 S. Ct. 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-grossjean-scotus-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack