Baker v. Green

103 A. 751, 30 Del. 113, 7 Boyce 113, 1918 Del. LEXIS 28
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided April 24, 1918·No. Covenant No. 31·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pennewill, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

It clearly appears from the admissions of the plaintiff that she is not a resident of this state within the meaning of the statute requiring security for costs, in that she has not a place of abode within this state at which a copy of process could be left.

[114] The fact that the plaintiff was a resident of this state, and had such an abode at the time the action was brought, does not relieve her from entering security for costs if she is not a resident of the state within the meaning of the statute at the time application for security is made. 1 Woolley, Del. Prac. § 305.

It is ordered that security for costs be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. Green, 103 A. 751, 30 Del. 113, 7 Boyce 113, 1918 Del. LEXIS 28 (Del. Ct. App. 1918).

103 A. 751 (Baker v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

E. J. Hollingsworth Co. v. Cesarini
129 A.2d 768 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1957)
Goldsberry v. Frank Clendaniel, Inc.
101 A.2d 805 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1953)
Weintraub v. Rudnick
143 A. 456 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1928)