Baker v. General Motors Corporation

138 F.3d 1225, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 4380
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 1998
Docket95-1604
StatusPublished

This text of 138 F.3d 1225 (Baker v. General Motors Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. General Motors Corporation, 138 F.3d 1225, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 4380 (8th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

138 F.3d 1225

Kenneth Lee BAKER; Steven Robert Baker, by next friend,
Melissa Thomas, Appellees,
v.
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Appellant,
The Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc., Amicus Curiae.

No. 95-1604.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit

March 10, 1998.

ORDER

In this products liability action, we reversed an eleven-million-dollar jury verdict against General Motors Corporation. See Baker v. General Motors Corp., 86 F.3d 811 (8th Cir.1996). Relevant facts are set forth in that opinion. We found: 1) that the district court had imposed too harsh a sanction for discovery abuses; 2) that the punitive damages award was defective; and 3) that the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution was violated when the district court allowed Ronald Elwell to testify in contravention of an injunction issued by a Michigan court. See id. at 818, 820. The decision was appealed to the United States Supreme Court. The question presented to the Supreme Court was whether this court erred "in holding that petitioners, who were not parties to state proceeding or in privity with any party, could be precluded from obtaining witness's testimony on basis of obligation to give full faith and credit to state court judgments." Baker v. General Motors Corp., --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1310, 137 L.Ed.2d 474 (1997). The Supreme Court reversed this court's judgment on that issue. See Baker v. General Motors Corp., --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 657, 139 L.Ed.2d 580 (1998).

Accordingly, it is ordered that those portions of this court's order dated June 14, 1996, that deal with the full faith and credit clause and Ronald Elwell's testimony are hereby vacated, the mandate issued by this court is recalled and this matter is remanded to the district court for a new trial consistent with our earlier order, see Baker, 86 F.3d at 816-820, as modified by the Supreme Court, Baker, --- U.S. at ---- - ----, 118 S.Ct. at 666-668.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. General Motors Corp.
522 U.S. 222 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Baker v. General Motors Corporation
86 F.3d 811 (Eighth Circuit, 1996)
Baker v. General Motors Corp.
138 F.3d 1225 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Reliable Business Computers v. Heurtebise
520 U.S. 1142 (Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 F.3d 1225, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 4380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-general-motors-corporation-ca8-1998.