Baker v. Durham

68 A.D.3d 1105, 890 N.Y.2d 349
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

“[W]here parents enter into an agreement concerning custody, it will not be set aside unless there is a sufficient change in circumstances since the time of the stipulation and unless the modification of the custody agreement is in the best interests of the child” (Matter of Lopez v Infante, 55 AD3d 837, 837-838 [2008]). The Family Court’s determination to deny, after a hearing, the father’s petition for a change of custody of the parties’ children is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Marriott v Hernandez, 55 AD3d 613, 613-614 [2008]; Matter of Moorehead v Moorehead, 197 AD2d 517, 519 [1993]). Accordingly, there is no basis to disturb the Family Court’s determination. Rivera, J.P., Miller, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. Durham, 68 A.D.3d 1105, 890 N.Y.2d 349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 1105 (Baker v. Durham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

G.O. v. S.O.
2025 NY Slip Op 50537(U) (New York Supreme Court, Richmond County, 2025)