Baker v. Dixon

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Baker v. Dixon

3 R.I. Dec. 53

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedNovember 17, 1926

DocketNo.45164

StatusPublished

This text of 3 R.I. Dec. 53 (Baker v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Dixon, 3 R.I. Dec. 53 (R.I. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BLODGETT, J.

Heard upon motion for new trial filed by defendant after verdict of a jury for plaintiff for $700.

Action for assault.

The assault was admitted but claimed to have been made under intense aggravation on part of plaintiff.

Defendant made the assault in a fit of passion provoked by words and action of plaintiff.

The court does not feel that punitive damages should have been assessed by the jury.

Motion for new trial granted unless within four days of the filing of this rescript plaintiff file a remittitur of all damages in excess of $500.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI