Baker v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Baker v. Director of Revenue

448 S.W.3d 361, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1285, 2014 WL 6463999

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 18, 2014·No. No. ED 101232·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The Director of Revenue (the Director) appeals the trial court’s judgment reinstating the driver’s license of Daniel Baker (Petitioner). The Director claims that the trial court erred as a matter of law by reinstating Petitioner’s driving privileges because Petitioner did not properly invoke his request for counsel, in that the officer did not hear Petitioner’s request. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The Director of Revenue (the Director) appeals the trial court’s judgment reinstating the driver’s license of Daniel Baker (Petitioner). The Director claims that the trial court erred as a matter of law by reinstating Petitioner’s driving privileges because Petitioner did not properly invoke his request for counsel, in that the officer did not hear Petitioner’s request. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Baker v. Director of Revenue, 448 S.W.3d 361, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1285, 2014 WL 6463999 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

448 S.W.3d 361 (Baker v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.