Baker v. Deigert

724 So. 2d 634, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16464, 1998 WL 906763
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 31, 1998
DocketNo. 98-1754
StatusPublished

This text of 724 So. 2d 634 (Baker v. Deigert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Deigert, 724 So. 2d 634, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16464, 1998 WL 906763 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinions

GRIFFIN, C.J.

We agree with appellant that the lower court erred in denying the motion to set aside the clerk’s default due to lack of notice to defendant as required by the rule. We, nevertheless, affirm the determination of the issue of liability in favor of the plaintiffs because we agree that the only arguably viable defense to liability — that the copy of the lease executed by the defendant was illegible — is legally insufficient. Even if true, having elected to sign a lease whose terms he was unable to read, the defendant may not now repudiate it.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, J., concurs. HARRIS, J., concurs in part; dissents in part, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MERRILL, LYNCH, PIERCE, ETC. v. Benton
467 So. 2d 311 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
724 So. 2d 634, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16464, 1998 WL 906763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-deigert-fladistctapp-1998.