Baker v. Deichman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Baker v. Deichman

1920 OK 49, 187 P. 212, 77 Okla. 142, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 209

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 3, 1920

Docket9561

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1920 OK 49 (Baker v. Deichman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Deichman, 1920 OK 49, 187 P. 212, 77 Okla. 142, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 209 (Okla. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

McNEILL, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the county court of Tulsa county. The petition in error was filed in this court on November 2, 1917. The case was assigned for submission at the December term, 1919. No briefs have been filed for the plaintiff in error. Rule 7 provides as follows:

“In each civil case filed in this court, counsel for plaintiff in error shall serve his brief on counsel for defendant in error at least 40 days before the case is set for submission.”

Where the plaintiff in error has failed to comply with the rule of the court, he is deemed to have waived his right to have his appeal heard in this court, and it will be presumed that said appeal has been abandoned Davis v. Elliott, 25 Okla. 395, 106 Pac. 817.

For the reasons stated, the appeal is dismissed.

OWEN, C. J., and KANE, PITCHFORD JOHNSON, and HIGGINS. JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI