Baker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Third Circuit

Baker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

81 F.2d 741, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 430, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3535

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJanuary 21, 1936

Docket5779

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 81 F.2d 741 (Baker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 81 F.2d 741, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 430, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3535 (3d Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition for review of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. The petitioner’s decedent traded, through brokers, in stocks and other securities which were handled in margin accounts. The Commissioner, applying the first-in first-out rule, held the taxpayer had not reported in full in 1926 and 1927 the profits made on sales of stock. The taxpayer kept her books on the cash receipts and disbursements basis.

Although several questions were argued before the Board of Tax Appeals, the single one before us is whether the profits were not income to the taxpayer because she did not in fact receive them but allowed them to remain with the brokers for use by them in handling her margin accounts. We think the brokers were her agents and that, when the sales were made at a profit, the receipt of the profit by them amounted to receipt of the profits by the taxpayer. The same question was decided in Webb v. Commissioner (C.C.A.) 67 F. (2d) 859. See, also, Corliss v. Bowers, 281 U.S. 376, 50 S.Ct. 336, 337, 74 L. Ed. 916, where it is held: “The income that is subject to a man’s unfettered command and that he is free to enjoy at his own option may be taxed to him as his income, whether he sees fit to enjoy it or not.”

The order of the Tax Board is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition for review of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. The petitioner’s decedent traded, through brokers, in stocks and other securities which were handled in margin accounts. The Commissioner, applying the first-in first-out rule, held the taxpayer had not reported in full in 1926 and 1927 the profits made on sales of stock. The taxpayer kept her books on the cash receipts and disbursements basis.

Although several questions were argued before the Board of Tax Appeals, the single one before us is whether the profits were not income to the taxpayer because she did not in fact receive them but allowed them to remain with the brokers for use by them in handling her margin accounts. We think the brokers were her agents and that, when the sales were made at a profit, the receipt of the profit by them amounted to receipt of the profits by the taxpayer. The same question was decided in Webb v. Commissioner (C.C.A.) 67 F. (2d) 859. See, also, Corliss v. Bowers, 281 U.S. 376, 50 S.Ct. 336, 337, 74 L. Ed. 916, where it is held: “The income that is subject to a man’s unfettered command and that he is free to enjoy at his own option may be taxed to him as his income, whether he sees fit to enjoy it or not.”

The order of the Tax Board is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 F.2d 741, 17 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 430, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca3-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack