Baker v. Cody

Supreme Court of Georgia

Baker v. Cody

112 S.E. 363, 153 Ga. 459, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 101

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 16, 1922·No. No. 2836·Published

Opinion

Eish, O. J.

The motion for new trial contains only the general ground that the verdict is contrary to evidence and without evidence to support it, and a ground based on newly discovered evidence. The verdict was authorized by the evidence submitted, and the newly discovered evidence being merely cumulative and impeaching in character, the refusal of a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eish, O. J.

The motion for new trial contains only the general ground that the verdict is contrary to evidence and without evidence to support it, and a ground based on newly discovered evidence. The verdict was authorized by the evidence submitted, and the newly discovered evidence being merely cumulative and impeaching in character, the refusal of a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Baker v. Cody, 112 S.E. 363, 153 Ga. 459, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 101 (Ga. 1922).

Pincite

112 S.E. 363 (Baker v. Cody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.