Baker v. Cody

Supreme Court of Georgia

Baker v. Cody

112 S.E. 363, 153 Ga. 459, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 101

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 16, 1922

DocketNo. 2836

StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 363 (Baker v. Cody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Cody, 112 S.E. 363, 153 Ga. 459, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 101 (Ga. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Eish, O. J.

The motion for new trial contains only the general ground that the verdict is contrary to evidence and without evidence to support it, and a ground based on newly discovered evidence. The verdict was authorized by the evidence submitted, and the newly discovered evidence being merely cumulative and impeaching in character, the refusal of a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eish, O. J.

The motion for new trial contains only the general ground that the verdict is contrary to evidence and without evidence to support it, and a ground based on newly discovered evidence. The verdict was authorized by the evidence submitted, and the newly discovered evidence being merely cumulative and impeaching in character, the refusal of a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 S.E. 363, 153 Ga. 459, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-cody-ga-1922.