Baker v. City of East Orange
114 A. 926, 96 N.J.L. 267, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 177
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.
[268]*268For affirmance—Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief ’ Justice, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kaltsci-i, Ivatzenbaoh, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker v. City of East Orange, 114 A. 926, 96 N.J.L. 267, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 177 (N.J. 1921).
114 A. 926 (Baker v. City of East Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Central R. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
29 F. Supp. 826 (S.D. New York, 1939)