Baker v. City of East Orange
114 A. 926, 96 N.J.L. 267, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 177
This text of 114 A. 926 (Baker v. City of East Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baker v. City of East Orange, 114 A. 926, 96 N.J.L. 267, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 177 (N.J. 1921).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.
[268]*268For affirmance—Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief ’ Justice, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kaltsci-i, Ivatzenbaoh, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Central R. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
29 F. Supp. 826 (S.D. New York, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
114 A. 926, 96 N.J.L. 267, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-city-of-east-orange-nj-1921.