Baker v. Citizens & Southern National Bank

242 S.E.2d 39, 240 Ga. 549, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 705
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 19, 1978·No. 33026·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Hill, Justice.

Relying on Code § 113-107, the testator’s widow attacked certain religious and educational devises in his will executed 13 months before his death. The superior court rejected her claims and upheld the validity of those devises based upon this court’s interpretation of that Code section in Hood v. First Nat. Bank of Columbus, 219 Ga. 283 (133 SE2d 19) (1963).

The appellant widow urges that Hood v. First Nat. Bank of Columbus, supra, should be overruled. We have reviewed that unanimous 1963 decision as well as the unanimous decisions it overruled and the legislative history of this Mortmain Act first enacted in 1863. We have determined that the Hood decision should be reaffirmed. Many of the reasons for this decision are amply stated in the Hood opinion and need not be restated here.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Jordan and Hall, JJ., who concur specially, and Nichols, C. J., who is disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. Citizens & Southern National Bank, 242 S.E.2d 39, 240 Ga. 549, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 705 (Ga. 1978).

242 S.E.2d 39 (Baker v. Citizens & Southern National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Angela Norred v. Steven P. Teaver
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013
Norred v. Teaver
740 S.E.2d 251 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)