Baker v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Baker v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

268 S.E.2d 722, 154 Ga. App. 325, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2144

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 10, 1980

Docket59618

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 268 S.E.2d 722 (Baker v. Chrysler Credit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 268 S.E.2d 722, 154 Ga. App. 325, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2144 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Deen, Chief Judge.

This is a pro se appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict granting the appellee’s writ of possession in support of its defaulted security interest in a certain described automobile bearing a cash price of $8,320 with down payment of $1,540 and calling for monthly payments of $208.86. That there was a trial is established by the jury verdict, but no transcript of evidence is included. In the judgment on the jury verdict the court specifically stated that the defendant had defaulted in the payment of the contract indebtedness. This is further borne out by the defendant’s appeal brief which does not deny that the installments were unpaid, but only contends that he could have paid them "with the financial assistance or help of his brothers, sisters, and relatives.” There is no contention, however, that such payments were either made or tendered at any time. Default being uncontested, the plaintiff was entitled to the secured property. Code § 109A-9 — 503.

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur. Neal L. Conner, Jr., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Chief Judge.

This is a pro se appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict granting the appellee’s writ of possession in support of its defaulted security interest in a certain described automobile bearing a cash price of $8,320 with down payment of $1,540 and calling for monthly payments of $208.86. That there was a trial is established by the jury verdict, but no transcript of evidence is included. In the judgment on the jury verdict the court specifically stated that the defendant had defaulted in the payment of the contract indebtedness. This is further borne out by the defendant’s appeal brief which does not deny that the installments were unpaid, but only contends that he could have paid them "with the financial assistance or help of his brothers, sisters, and relatives.” There is no contention, however, that such payments were either made or tendered at any time. Default being uncontested, the plaintiff was entitled to the secured property. Code § 109A-9 — 503.

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur. Neal L. Conner, Jr., for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 S.E.2d 722, 154 Ga. App. 325, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-chrysler-credit-corp-gactapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack