Baker v. Cavolt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Baker v. Cavolt

111 N.E.2d 668, 123 Ind. App. 484, 1953 Ind. App. LEXIS 143

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 16, 1953

DocketNo. 18,410

StatusPublished

This text of 111 N.E.2d 668 (Baker v. Cavolt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Cavolt, 111 N.E.2d 668, 123 Ind. App. 484, 1953 Ind. App. LEXIS 143 (Ind. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Royse, C. J.

— This is an attempt by appellant to appeal from a judgment of the Clay Circuit Court in favor of appellee.

Appellee has filed his motion to dismiss the appeal or in the alternative to affirm the judgment for the reason the . assignment of errors herein presents no question.

The assignment of errors herein, omitting formal parts, is as follows:

“i. That there was manifest error occurring at the trial, by the Court, in overruling the defendant’s motion for a finding for the defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, for failure of the plaintiff to establish by alleging and proving that she was a duly licensed real estate salesman, under the laws of the State of Indiana.

“2. The finding of the Court is contrary to law.

“3. The finding of the Court is not sustained by sufficient evidence.”

These are not proper independent assignments of error. Indiana Trial and Appellate Practice, by Flanagan, Wiltrout & Hamilton, §2386, pp. 156, 157.

■ Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Note. — Reported iii 111 N. E. 2d 668.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI