Baker v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Baker v. Board of Commissioners

18 Ind. 170

DecidedMay 15, 1862

StatusPublished

This text of 18 Ind. 170 (Baker v. Board of Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Board of Commissioners, 18 Ind. 170 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause wa| dismissed in the Court below, and there is no bill of exceptions showing the reason. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

Where a Court appoints an attorney to perform services, the Court should make an allowance, which the auditor of [171]*171the county should draw his warrant for, and the treasurer should pay. 1 R. S. by Gavin & Hord, p. 64, sec. 4. The judgment is affirmed, with costs.,

John Baker, for appellant. William E. Niblack, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause wa| dismissed in the Court below, and there is no bill of exceptions showing the reason. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

Where a Court appoints an attorney to perform services, the Court should make an allowance, which the auditor of [171]*171the county should draw his warrant for, and the treasurer should pay. 1 R. S. by Gavin & Hord, p. 64, sec. 4. The judgment is affirmed, with costs.,

John Baker, for appellant. William E. Niblack, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Ind. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-board-of-commissioners-ind-1862.