Baker v. Blum
This text of 65 Misc. 177 (Baker v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order appealed from vacates an order for the examination of the judgment debtor in proceedings supplementary to execution, with twenty dollars costs to be paid personally by the attorney for the judgment creditor.
The court was without authority to impose costs against the attorney personally.
The order is modified by striking out the provision directing the attorney for the judgment creditor to pay twenty dollars costs and, as modified, is affirmed, without costs.
Gildersleeve and Lehman, JJ., concur.
Order modified, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 Misc. 177, 119 N.Y.S. 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-blum-nyappterm-1909.