Baker v. Best
This text of 239 So. 2d 530 (Baker v. Best) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. On the issue of damages, see Freeman v. Bandlow, (Fla.App.1962), 143 So.2d 547; Shaw v. Puleo, (Fla.1964) 159 So.2d 641. As to the applicability of the collateral source rule to the facts of this case, see McElwain v. Capotosto, (1954) 332 Mass. 1, 122 N.E.2d 901; Perry v. Public Service Coordinated Transport, (1948) 136 N.J.L. 398, 56 A.2d 617.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 So. 2d 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-best-fladistctapp-1970.