Baker v. Best

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Baker v. Best

239 So. 2d 530

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 24, 1970·No. No. M-285·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. On the issue of damages, see Freeman v. Bandlow, (Fla.App.1962), 143 So.2d 547; Shaw v. Puleo, (Fla.1964) 159 So.2d 641. As to the applicability of the collateral source rule to the facts of this case, see McElwain v. Capotosto, (1954) 332 Mass. 1, 122 N.E.2d 901; Perry v. Public Service Coordinated Transport, (1948) 136 N.J.L. 398, 56 A.2d 617.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. On the issue of damages, see Freeman v. Bandlow, (Fla.App.1962), 143 So.2d 547; Shaw v. Puleo, (Fla.1964) 159 So.2d 641. As to the applicability of the collateral source rule to the facts of this case, see McElwain v. Capotosto, (1954) 332 Mass. 1, 122 N.E.2d 901; Perry v. Public Service Coordinated Transport, (1948) 136 N.J.L. 398, 56 A.2d 617.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Baker v. Best, 239 So. 2d 530 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

239 So. 2d 530 (Baker v. Best) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related