Baker v. Bensalz Productions, Inc.
Opinion
ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: □ DATE FILED:__7/2/20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Belinda Baker, et al., Plaintiffs, 20-cy-3342 (AJN) —y— ORDER Bensalz Productions, Inc., et al., Defendants.
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: On June 26, 2020, Defendants filed motions to dismiss. See Dkt. Nos. 81, 82. Pursuant to Rule 3.F. of this Court’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases, and as stated in its June 24, 2020 Memo Endorsement, Dkt. No. 80, on or before August 10, 2020, Plaintiffs must notify the Court and their adversaries in writing whether (1) they intend to file an amended pleading and when they will doso or (2) they will rely on the pleading being attacked. Plaintiffs are on notice that declining to amend their pleadings to timely respond to a fully briefed argument in the Defendants’ June 26 motions to dismiss may well constitute a waiver of the Plaintiffs’ right to use the amendment process to cure any defects that have been made apparent by the Defendants’ briefing. See Loreley Fin. (Jersey) No. 3 Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Sec., LLC.,797 F.3d 160, 190 (2d Cir. 2015) deaving “unaltered the grounds on which denial of leave to amend has long been held proper, such as undue delay, bad faith, dilatory motive, and futility”). If Plaintiffs choose to amend, Defendants may then (a) file an answer; (b) file a new motion to dismiss; or (c) submit a letter stating that they rely on the initially-filed motions to dismiss. Nothing in this Order alters the time to amend, answer or move provided by the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Rules. The Court also notes that Plaintiff Belinda Baker attempted to file a pro se consent to receive electronic service. Ms. Baker may not proceed pro se until Mr. Li, counsel who has appeared on her behalf in this case, withdraws his appearance. Accordingly, if Ms. Baker intends to proceed pro se, Mr. Lishall move to withdraw his appearance and Ms. Baker shall refile her pro se consent to receive electronic service by July 31, 2020. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail this Order to Plaintiffs and to note that mailing on the public docket.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 2, 2020 New York, New York
ALISONJ.NATHAN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker v. Bensalz Productions, Inc. (Baker v. Bensalz Productions, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.