Baker v. Beach
15 Wis. 99
Opinion
By the Court,
In Button vs. Schroyer, 5 Wis., 598, this court held that in actions of this character, the judgment, instead of being for a sale of the property, should be, that unless the money due was paid in a specified time, the defendants should be barred of all equity of redemption.
This makes it necessary to reverse this judgment, and remand the cause with directions to enter judgment in accordance with that decision.
Judgment reversed, with costs, and cause remanded accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker v. Beach, 15 Wis. 99 (Wis. 1862).
15 Wis. 99 (Baker v. Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oconto Co. v. Bacon
195 N.W. 412 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1923)
Sievers v. Brown
45 L.R.A. 642 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1899)
Nelson v. Jacobs
75 N.W. 406 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1898)
Superior Consolidated Land Co. v. Nichols
51 N.W. 878 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1892)
Church v. Smith
39 Wis. 492 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1876)