Baker v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baker v. Baker

51 A.D.3d 612, 855 N.Y.S.2d 919

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.3d 612 (Baker v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Baker, 51 A.D.3d 612, 855 N.Y.S.2d 919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant former wife appeals from - a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Krauss, J.), dated August 16, 2006, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiff husband a divorce.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Neither the sparse record nor the arguments offered by the appellant demonstrate any basis for reversal of the judgment of divorce. The appellant’s contentions regarding the alleged lack of service are not properly before this Court, as the record contains no evidence that these arguments were raised in the Supreme Court. Lifson, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant former wife appeals from - a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Krauss, J.), dated August 16, 2006, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiff husband a divorce.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Neither the sparse record nor the arguments offered by the appellant demonstrate any basis for reversal of the judgment of divorce. The appellant’s contentions regarding the alleged lack of service are not properly before this Court, as the record contains no evidence that these arguments were raised in the Supreme Court. Lifson, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.3d 612, 855 N.Y.S.2d 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-baker-nyappdiv-2008.