Baker v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baker v. Baker

46 A.D.2d 866, 362 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.2d 866 (Baker v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Baker, 46 A.D.2d 866, 362 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on August 13, 1974, which directs [867]*867defendant to pay for the support of the parties’ infant child pending the determination of an action for separation, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reducing the amount to be paid for the support of the child to $100 per week, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Upon the record before us, giving due consideration to all the relevant circumstances, the award of support for the child was excessive and should be reduced to the extent indicated herein. Concur—Nunez, J. Pv Murphy, Lupiano, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on August 13, 1974, which directs [867]*867defendant to pay for the support of the parties’ infant child pending the determination of an action for separation, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reducing the amount to be paid for the support of the child to $100 per week, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Upon the record before us, giving due consideration to all the relevant circumstances, the award of support for the child was excessive and should be reduced to the extent indicated herein. Concur—Nunez, J. Pv Murphy, Lupiano, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 866, 362 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-baker-nyappdiv-1974.