Baker v. Baker

Michigan Supreme Court

Baker v. Baker

711 N.W.2d 372, 474 Mich. 1095

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 27, 2006

Docket130102

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 711 N.W.2d 372 (Baker v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker v. Baker, 711 N.W.2d 372, 474 Mich. 1095 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

711 N.W.2d 372 (2006) 474 Mich. 1095

Ronald Carl BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Suzanne Mary BAKER, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 130102, COA No. 253718.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 27, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 3, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

711 N.W.2d 372 (2006) 474 Mich. 1095

Ronald Carl BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Suzanne Mary BAKER, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 130102, COA No. 253718.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 27, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 3, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

711 N.W.2d 372, 474 Mich. 1095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-baker-mich-2006.

Opinion

Ronald Carl BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Suzanne Mary BAKER, Defendant-Appellee.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Ronald Carl BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Suzanne Mary BAKER, Defendant-Appellee.