Baker v. Bagnole

98 A. 851, 86 N.J. Eq. 240, 1 Stock. 240, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 442
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 19, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 98 A. 851 (Baker v. Bagnole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baker v. Bagnole, 98 A. 851, 86 N.J. Eq. 240, 1 Stock. 240, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 442 (N.J. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Fort.

For affirmance — Ti-ib Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 A. 851, 86 N.J. Eq. 240, 1 Stock. 240, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-bagnole-nj-1916.