Baker v. American Railway Express Co.

224 N.W. 513, 207 Iowa 1350
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided April 5, 1929·No. No. 39594.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Morling, J.

— In Barber v. Shattuck, 207 Iowa 842, an appeal by plaintiff’ from an order setting" aside default was dismissed on the court’s own motion. We need not repeat what is there said. Though no motion to dismiss is made in this case, and the question of the appealability of the order is not raised by appellee, yet, following the Barber ease, it is our duty to take notice of the non-appealability of the order here attempted to be appealed from. This court has in some previous cases considered the merits of appeals from orders setting aside defaults. The attention of the court was not, in those cases, called to the question of non-appealability, and they are not to be taken as precedents for the consideration of the merits of an appeal from ord'ei setting aside default. Of course, if the motion to set aside default is overruled, then the case is finally disposed of, and a different rule would apply: — Appeal dismissed.

All the justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. American Railway Express Co., 224 N.W. 513, 207 Iowa 1350 (iowa 1929).

224 N.W. 513 (Baker v. American Railway Express Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kulhavy v. Rugger
41 N.W.2d 664 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1950)
In Re Estate of Hale
2 N.W.2d 772 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1942)
Rayburn v. Maher
288 N.W. 136 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1939)
Ontjes v. McNider
275 N.W. 328 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1937)
Kirk v. Betz
250 N.W. 182 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1933)
Wagoner v. Ring
240 N.W. 634 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1932)
Joslin v. Continental & Commercial National Bank
238 N.W. 715 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1931)