Baker, Kenneth W., Individually and Kenneth W. Baker, D.D.S., P.C. v. Yasoni, Marc S.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Baker, Kenneth W., Individually and Kenneth W. Baker, D.D.S., P.C. v. Yasoni, Marc S.

DecidedSeptember 28, 2000

Docket13-00-00421-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Baker, Kenneth W., Individually and Kenneth W. Baker, D.D.S., P.C. v. Yasoni, Marc S. (Baker, Kenneth W., Individually and Kenneth W. Baker, D.D.S., P.C. v. Yasoni, Marc S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baker, Kenneth W., Individually and Kenneth W. Baker, D.D.S., P.C. v. Yasoni, Marc S., (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-00-421-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

KENNETH W. BAKER, INDIVIDUALLY,

AND KENNETH W. BAKER, D.D.S., P.C.

, Appellants,

v.

MARC S. YASONI

, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Chavez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, KENNETH W. BAKER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND KENNETH W. BAKER, D.D.S., P.C., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-3662-98-A. After the clerk's record was filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellants state that this case has been resolved and appellants no longer wish to prosecute this appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 28^th day of September, 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-00-421-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

KENNETH W. BAKER, INDIVIDUALLY,

AND KENNETH W. BAKER, D.D.S., P.C.

, Appellants,

v.

MARC S. YASONI

, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Chavez

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, KENNETH W. BAKER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND KENNETH W. BAKER, D.D.S., P.C., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-3662-98-A. After the clerk's record was filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellants state that this case has been resolved and appellants no longer wish to prosecute this appeal. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 28^th day of September, 2000.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Baker, Kenneth W., Individually and Kenneth W. Baker, D.D.S., P.C. v. Yasoni, Marc S., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-kenneth-w-individually-and-kenneth-w-baker-d-texapp-2000.