Baker Irons & Dockstader, Inc. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 834
Opinion
When the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff.
[835]*835An examination of the official record discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value for the merchandise found by the appraiser.
I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker Irons & Dockstader, Inc. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 834 (cusc 1958).
40 Cust. Ct. 834 (Baker Irons & Dockstader, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.