Baker Hughes Inteq v. Lotus, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Baker Hughes Inteq v. Lotus, L.L.C.

225 S.W.3d 620, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 6939, 2006 WL 2223036

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 4, 2006·No. 08-04-00240-CV·Published

Opinion

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Pending before the Court is a joint motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(2). The parties represent to the Court that all matters in controversy in the underlying lawsuit have been settled by agreement between the parties. The parties request that this appeal be dismissed and that the costs be assessed against the party incurring same. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(d). The Court concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal with costs taxed against the party incurring same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Pending before the Court is a joint motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(2). The parties represent to the Court that all matters in controversy in the underlying lawsuit have been settled by agreement between the parties. The parties request that this appeal be dismissed and that the costs be assessed against the party incurring same. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.1(d). The Court concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal with costs taxed against the party incurring same.

Baker Hughes Inteq v. Lotus, L.L.C., 225 S.W.3d 620, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 6939, 2006 WL 2223036 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

225 S.W.3d 620 (Baker Hughes Inteq v. Lotus, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.