BAKER FARMING COMPANY, LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT BAKER FARMING COMPANY, LLC, Case No. 1:24-cv-01120-KES-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET v. TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (ECF No. 19) Defendant. On September 18, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of the entire action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), ‘a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.’” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999), quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can’t complain, and the district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it.” Id. at 1078; see also Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th Cir. 1993). In this action, no defendant has filed an answer, other responsive pleading, or motion for summary judgment. / / / Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. Se Dated: _ September 19, 2025 " STANLEY A. BOONE United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BAKER FARMING COMPANY, LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (BAKER FARMING COMPANY, LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.