Baker Concrete Construction, Inc. v. Whaley Steel Corporation
765 N.W.2d 333
Opinion
BAKER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. and Etkin Skanska Construction Company of Michigan, f/k/a Etkin Construction Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellees,
v.
WHALEY STEEL CORPORATION and CNA Insurance, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and
Transportation Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and
United States Fire Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and
Edgewood Electric Company, United States Fidelity & Guarantee Company, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, and TIG Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellees, and
L.W. Connelly & Sons, Inc., d/b/a Connelly Crane Rental Corporation, d/b/a Connelly Crane and St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion to withdraw the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is GRANTED. The applications for leave to appeal as cross-appellants are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baker Concrete Construction, Inc. v. Whaley Steel Corporation, 765 N.W.2d 333 (Mich. 2009).
765 N.W.2d 333 (Baker Concrete Construction, Inc. v. Whaley Steel Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edward C. Levy Co. v. Metamora Twp.
765 N.W.2d 333 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)