Baker Concrete Construction, Inc. v. Whaley Steel Corporation
This text of 765 N.W.2d 333 (Baker Concrete Construction, Inc. v. Whaley Steel Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BAKER CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC. and Etkin Skanska Construction Company of Michigan, f/k/a Etkin Construction Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellees,
v.
WHALEY STEEL CORPORATION and CNA Insurance, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, and
Transportation Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and
United States Fire Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and
Edgewood Electric Company, United States Fidelity & Guarantee Company, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, and TIG Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellees, and
L.W. Connelly & Sons, Inc., d/b/a Connelly Crane Rental Corporation, d/b/a Connelly Crane and St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion to withdraw the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is GRANTED. The applications for leave to appeal as cross-appellants are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
765 N.W.2d 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-concrete-construction-inc-v-whaley-steel-corporation-mich-2009.