BAKER-BELL v. Bell

353 S.W.3d 99, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1237, 2011 WL 4392192
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 20, 2011·No. ED 96145·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Latham Bell (Father) appeals the circuit court’s judgment approving the relocation of his former spouse, Terease Baker-Bell (Mother), and their two children.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BAKER-BELL v. Bell, 353 S.W.3d 99, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1237, 2011 WL 4392192 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

353 S.W.3d 99 (BAKER-BELL v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Setzer v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY
353 S.W.3d 99 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)