BakeMark USA LLC v. Negron

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 26, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-02360·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED BAKEMARK USA LLC, DOC □□ DATE FILED: _ 6/26/2023 Plaintiff, -against- 23 Civ. 2360 (AT) BRIAN NEGRON, JOSE NEGRON JR, ORDER BAKERS DEPOT LLC, and NF TRANSPORTATION LLC, Defendants. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiff, BakeMark USA LLC (“BakeMark”), moves by order to show cause for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. ECF No. 8; see also ECF No. 9. Following expedited discovery, e.g., ECF Nos. 25, 34, 50, 54, 62, the parties fully briefed Plaintiff's motion, ECF Nos. 65, 73, 77, 81. After careful review of the parties’ papers, which include affidavits, deposition transcripts, and other documentary evidence, the Court determines that there are contested issues of fact. These include, but are not limited to: (1) the relationship between Defendant Bakers Depot LLC (“Bakers Depot”) and JB Freight LLC, and whether the latter is only a freight services company, compare ECF No. 65 at 4-6 (citations omitted), with ECF No. 81 at 9-12 (citations omitted); (2) whether certain former BakeMark employees work for Defendant Bakers Depot, ECF No. 81 at 14—15 (citations omitted); and (3) the impact of a preliminary injunction on Defendants’ business, compare ECF No. 71 § 34, with ECF No. 9 at 28, and ECF No. 81 at 19. See also ECF No. 79 § 7 (noting alleged inaccuracies in Defendants’ deposition testimony). The Court concludes that, “[b]ecause the briefs and affidavits present disputed issues of fact,” an evidentiary hearing is necessary to resolve Plaintiff's motion. Forts v. Ward, 566 F.2d 849, 851 (2d Cir. 1977); see also id. (“It is well established that motions for preliminary injunctions should not be resolved on the basis of affidavits which evince disputed issues of fact. Normally, an evidentiary hearing is required to decide credibility issues.”). Accordingly, by separate order, the Court shall refer the evidentiary hearing and Plaintiff's motion to the Honorable Barbara C. Moses. The show cause hearing scheduled for June 27, 2023, is ADJOURNED sine die. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 26, 2023 New York, New York Oj- ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BakeMark USA LLC v. Negron, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

BakeMark USA LLC v. Negron (BakeMark USA LLC v. Negron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Forts v. Ward
566 F.2d 849 (Second Circuit, 1977)