Bakas v. Catherine Ohlandt, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bakas v. Catherine Ohlandt, Inc.

306 A.D.2d 364, 760 N.Y.S.2d 858

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 306 A.D.2d 364 (Bakas v. Catherine Ohlandt, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bakas v. Catherine Ohlandt, Inc., 306 A.D.2d 364, 760 N.Y.S.2d 858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a hybrid action for a judgment declaring a certain contract between the parties unenforceable as against public policy and a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered July 5, 2001, which denied the petition and declared that the parties’ controversy regarding the enforceability of the contract is arbitrable. Justice McGinity has been substituted for the late Justice O’Brien (see 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the dispute between the parties is arbitrable (see Matter of Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co. v Investors Ins. Co. of Am., 37 NY2d 91 [1975]). Krausman, J.P., McGinity, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a hybrid action for a judgment declaring a certain contract between the parties unenforceable as against public policy and a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the appeal is from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered July 5, 2001, which denied the petition and declared that the parties’ controversy regarding the enforceability of the contract is arbitrable. Justice McGinity has been substituted for the late Justice O’Brien (see 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the dispute between the parties is arbitrable (see Matter of Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co. v Investors Ins. Co. of Am., 37 NY2d 91 [1975]). Krausman, J.P., McGinity, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 364, 760 N.Y.S.2d 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakas-v-catherine-ohlandt-inc-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack