Bakarania v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bakarania v. State

867 So. 2d 638, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3079, 2004 WL 442878

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 12, 2004

DocketNo. 5D03-1969

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 867 So. 2d 638 (Bakarania v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bakarania v. State, 867 So. 2d 638, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3079, 2004 WL 442878 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the Order and Amended Order entered on July 2, 2003, which vacated an earlier order. The State concedes error in that the trial court did not have jurisdiction due to an intervening Notice of Appeal. See Haines v. State, 805 So.2d 972 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Appellant’s remaining point on appeal is moot.

The Order and Amended. Order dated July 2, 2003, are vacated.

THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the Order and Amended Order entered on July 2, 2003, which vacated an earlier order. The State concedes error in that the trial court did not have jurisdiction due to an intervening Notice of Appeal. See Haines v. State, 805 So.2d 972 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Appellant’s remaining point on appeal is moot.

The Order and Amended. Order dated July 2, 2003, are vacated.

THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

867 So. 2d 638, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3079, 2004 WL 442878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakarania-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack