Bakarania v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bakarania v. State

867 So. 2d 638, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3079, 2004 WL 442878

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 2004·No. No. 5D03-1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the Order and Amended Order entered on July 2, 2003, which vacated an earlier order. The State concedes error in that the trial court did not have jurisdiction due to an intervening Notice of Appeal. See Haines v. State, 805 So.2d 972 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Appellant’s remaining point on appeal is moot.

The Order and Amended. Order dated July 2, 2003, are vacated.

THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the Order and Amended Order entered on July 2, 2003, which vacated an earlier order. The State concedes error in that the trial court did not have jurisdiction due to an intervening Notice of Appeal. See Haines v. State, 805 So.2d 972 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Appellant’s remaining point on appeal is moot.

The Order and Amended. Order dated July 2, 2003, are vacated.

THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Bakarania v. State, 867 So. 2d 638, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3079, 2004 WL 442878 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

867 So. 2d 638 (Bakarania v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related