Bakalar v. Hudson Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bakalar v. Hudson Transit Corp.

254 A.D. 582, 3 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6648

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 582 (Bakalar v. Hudson Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bakalar v. Hudson Transit Corp., 254 A.D. 582, 3 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6648 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff, a passenger in defendant’s bus, when she was thrown from her seat by the sudden stop of the bus when the brakes were being tested under the supervision of a policeman, judgment for defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. The case was submitted tp the jury, with the acquiescence of the plaintiff, on the issue as to whether notice or yarning was given to the passengers by the policeman and the operator that the test was about to he made. Under the circumstances plaintiff may not now be heard to complain that defendant was negligent in permitting the test to be made while the passengers _ were in the bus. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff, a passenger in defendant’s bus, when she was thrown from her seat by the sudden stop of the bus when the brakes were being tested under the supervision of a policeman, judgment for defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. The case was submitted tp the jury, with the acquiescence of the plaintiff, on the issue as to whether notice or yarning was given to the passengers by the policeman and the operator that the test was about to he made. Under the circumstances plaintiff may not now be heard to complain that defendant was negligent in permitting the test to be made while the passengers _ were in the bus. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 582, 3 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakalar-v-hudson-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1938.