Bakal v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bakal v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board

81 A.D.2d 851, 440 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11525

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 851 (Bakal v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bakal v. New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, 81 A.D.2d 851, 440 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated January 10, 1979, which let stand a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated March 31, 1978, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint of unlawful discrimination based on sex, for lack of probable cause. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determination of the State Division of Human Rights was neither arbitrary nor capricious and is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated January 10, 1979, which let stand a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated March 31, 1978, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint of unlawful discrimination based on sex, for lack of probable cause. Order confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The determination of the State Division of Human Rights was neither arbitrary nor capricious and is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 851, 440 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakal-v-new-york-state-human-rights-appeal-board-nyappdiv-1981.