Bak v. Bak

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bak v. Bak

947 So. 2d 621, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 190, 2007 WL 57266

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 10, 2007

DocketNo. 4D06-1348

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 947 So. 2d 621 (Bak v. Bak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bak v. Bak, 947 So. 2d 621, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 190, 2007 WL 57266 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The former husband appeals from an order of contempt. He has failed to present a transcript of proceedings, and thus the appropriateness of the sanctions in the order cannot be addressed, nor can the issue raised with respect to the admissibility of evidence. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). With respect to his claim that the order requires immediate incarceration upon future non-compliance, the order of contempt contains no such mandatory language. All the trial judge did was express [622]*622a hope that a successor judge would incarcerate the appellant in the event that he were subsequently found to have violated the terms of the final judgment.

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The former husband appeals from an order of contempt. He has failed to present a transcript of proceedings, and thus the appropriateness of the sanctions in the order cannot be addressed, nor can the issue raised with respect to the admissibility of evidence. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). With respect to his claim that the order requires immediate incarceration upon future non-compliance, the order of contempt contains no such mandatory language. All the trial judge did was express [622]*622a hope that a successor judge would incarcerate the appellant in the event that he were subsequently found to have violated the terms of the final judgment.

WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

947 So. 2d 621, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 190, 2007 WL 57266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bak-v-bak-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack