Bajorek v. Telecom Plus of Upstate New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bajorek v. Telecom Plus of Upstate New York, Inc.

119 A.D.2d 714, 501 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55640

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A.D.2d 714 (Bajorek v. Telecom Plus of Upstate New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bajorek v. Telecom Plus of Upstate New York, Inc., 119 A.D.2d 714, 501 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55640 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for intentional infliction of emotional distress and breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Rubenfeld, J.), dated May 29, 1985, which granted the plaintiffs motion to vacate the defendant’s notice to produce and first series of interrogatories, with leave to the defendant to serve new interrogatories.

Order modified, by adding a provision thereto that the defendant is also granted leave, if it be so advised, to serve a new notice to produce in proper form. As so modified, order affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff. (See, Benzenberg v Telecom Plus, 119 AD2d 717.) Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for intentional infliction of emotional distress and breach of contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Rubenfeld, J.), dated May 29, 1985, which granted the plaintiffs motion to vacate the defendant’s notice to produce and first series of interrogatories, with leave to the defendant to serve new interrogatories.

Order modified, by adding a provision thereto that the defendant is also granted leave, if it be so advised, to serve a new notice to produce in proper form. As so modified, order affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff. (See, Benzenberg v Telecom Plus, 119 AD2d 717.) Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 714, 501 N.Y.S.2d 602, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bajorek-v-telecom-plus-of-upstate-new-york-inc-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack