BAJEMA v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

BAJEMA v. Division of Employment Security

340 S.W.3d 351, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 552, 2011 WL 1542936

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 26, 2011·No. WD 72902·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Bajema appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision that she was overpaid unemployment benefits during a period in which she was not eligible to receive benefits. On appeal, Bajema contends that the Division of Employment Security should not be able to recoup the benefits she received because the overpayments resulted from the Division’s errors and not from Baje-ma’s actions. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Bajema appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision that she was overpaid unemployment benefits during a period in which she was not eligible to receive benefits. On appeal, Bajema contends that the Division of Employment Security should not be able to recoup the benefits she received because the overpayments resulted from the Division’s errors and not from Baje-ma’s actions. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

BAJEMA v. Division of Employment Security, 340 S.W.3d 351, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 552, 2011 WL 1542936 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

340 S.W.3d 351 (BAJEMA v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.