Baits v. People

16 N.E. 483, 123 Ill. 428, 1888 Ill. LEXIS 1031
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 20, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 16 N.E. 483 (Baits v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baits v. People, 16 N.E. 483, 123 Ill. 428, 1888 Ill. LEXIS 1031 (Ill. 1888).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Craig

delivered the opinion of the Court s

This was an indictment under paragraphs 73 and 74, section 46, of the Criminal Code. (Starr & Curtis’ Stat. p. 769.) The punishment provided for a violation of paragraph 73 is imprisonment in the penitentiary not exceeding three years, or a fine not exceeding $1000. Under paragraph 74, the punishment provided when a person is convicted, is a fine of not less than $100 and not more than $5000, and imprisonment, either in the penitentiary or county jail, for a period not exceeding two years. Sections 5 and 6, chapter 38, of the Criminal Code, (Starr & Curtis, 829,) provide: “A felony is an offence punishable with death, or by imprisonment in the penitentiary. * * * Every other offence is a misdemeanor.”

This statute was before us in Lamkin v. The People, 94 Ill. 501, and we there held, when the offence may be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary, or by fine, only, in the discretion of the court or jury, it is only a misdemeanor. Here the plaintiff in error sued out the writ of error directly from this court to the circuit court, and the defendant having been convicted of a misdemeanor, the question is raised whether this court has jurisdiction. Section 88 of the Practice act is conclusive of the question. That act declares, appeals from and writs of error to circuits courts, the Superior Court of Cook county, the Criminal Court of Cook county, county courts and city courts, in all criminal cases below the grade of felony, shall be taken directly to the Appellate Court. The offence charged in the indictment, of which the defendant was convicted, being a misdemeanor, he could not sue out a writ of error in this court, but, Under the plain reading of the statute, he was bound to go to the Appellate Court.

The writ of error will be dismissed. Leave will be given plaintiff in error to withdraw record, abstracts and briefs, to be used in the Appellate Court, if he desires.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Prather
306 N.E.2d 361 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)
The PEOPLE v. Hise
272 N.E.2d 264 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1971)
Brown v. State
232 So. 2d 55 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
The People v. Novotny
244 N.E.2d 182 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1968)
People v. Bain
274 Ill. App. 215 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1934)
The People v. Siemen
184 N.E. 617 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1933)
Seitz v. Ohio State Medical Board
157 N.E. 304 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1926)
People v. Godding
136 P. 1011 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1913)
People v. Garfinkle
169 Ill. App. 554 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1912)
Quillin v. Commonwealth
54 S.E. 333 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1906)
Towne v. People
89 Ill. App. 258 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1900)
Prussing v. Jackson
85 Ill. App. 324 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 N.E. 483, 123 Ill. 428, 1888 Ill. LEXIS 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baits-v-people-ill-1888.