Baist v. E. W. Edwards & Son
262 A.D. 812, 28 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 27, 1941
StatusPublished
This text of 262 A.D. 812 (Baist v. E. W. Edwards & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baist v. E. W. Edwards & Son, 262 A.D. 812, 28 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Harris, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial. (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action by direction of the court in an action for false arrest and malicious prosecution.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 812, 28 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baist-v-e-w-edwards-son-nyappdiv-1941.