Baist v. E. W. Edwards & Son

262 A.D. 812, 28 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Harris, J., who dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial. (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action by direction of the court in an action for false arrest and malicious prosecution.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baist v. E. W. Edwards & Son, 262 A.D. 812, 28 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

262 A.D. 812 (Baist v. E. W. Edwards & Son) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.