Bais v. Nash

157 N.Y.S. 884
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 13, 1916·Published

Opinion

WEEKS, J.

[1] The default of defendant having been taken after the presentation of an affidavit showing actual engagement of counsel in the United States District Court, Eastern District, the imposition of terms was unwarranted. Gotham Raincoat Co. v. Levey (Sup.) 149 N. Y. Supp. 482; Solomon v. Sultan Flore Cigarette Co. (Sup.) 153 N. Y. Supp. 947; Goldstein v. Frumkes, 74 Misc. Rep. 450, 132 N. Y. Supp. 318; Wadler v. Karpel, 78 Misc. Rep. 376, 138 N. Y. Supp. 367; Wolff v. Stern (Sup.) 149 N. Y. Supp. 908.

[2] As appellant upon his brief expresses his willingness, however, to take the deposition of plaintiff, that condition of the order will be allowed to remain.

The order should be modified, by striking therefrom the conditions of the payment of costs and the deposit of the amount of the judgment with the clerk as security, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $10 costs to appellant. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bais v. Nash, 157 N.Y.S. 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

157 N.Y.S. 884 (Bais v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldstein v. Frumkes
74 Misc. 450 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Wadler v. Karpel
78 Misc. 376 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Gotham Raincoat Co. v. Levey
149 N.Y.S. 482 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Wolff v. Stern
149 N.Y.S. 908 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Solomon v. Sultan Flore Cigarette Co.
153 N.Y.S. 947 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)