Bairwol Co. v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 291, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 192
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 31, 1948
DocketNo. 52243; petition 6619-R (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Cust. Ct. 291 (Bairwol Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bairwol Co. v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 291, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 192 (cusc 1948).

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

A partner in the petitioning firm testified that- the petitioner purchased the art work and story from which plates were made; that matrices were supplied to a Mexican company for printing the inserts of the books; that the books were shipped to this country where covers and binding were obtained to complete them; that petitioner, the agent of the Mexican seller, after completion of the books, sold them to a distributing company; and that the appraised price of 4.85 cents was arrived at from prices disclosed in the contracts made by the petitioner with the distributing company. Before the goods were shipped, the witness visited the United States Treasury attache's office in Mexico City in an endeavor to determine the price for entry purposes and was given a formula to compute the cost. He instructed the shipper to follow said formula and the shipper and petitioner, after taking into consideration all proper costs and charges, including the profit against the item to be made up, arrived at a valuation of 4 cents for the purpose of making entry.

The customhouse broker testified that he submitted a request for information to the appraiser at which time the examiner had no information; that the merchandise was then entered at the invoice price; that subsequently he was advised to amend the entry, but while awaiting instructions from the petitioner to amend, the entry was passed at an advanced value. From the entire record it was held that the petitioner and its broker disclosed all information in their possession to the proper customs officials and that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Cust. Ct. 291, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bairwol-co-v-united-states-cusc-1948.